investorscraft@gmail.com

Stock Analysis & Valuation361 Degrees International Limited (1361.HK)

Professional Stock Screener
Previous Close
HK$5.75
Sector Valuation Confidence Level
Moderate
Valuation methodValue, HK$Upside, %
Artificial intelligence (AI)34.50500
Intrinsic value (DCF)13.65137
Graham-Dodd Method3.40-41
Graham Formula16.30183

Strategic Investment Analysis

Company Overview

361 Degrees International Limited is a prominent Chinese sportswear manufacturer and retailer headquartered in Xiamen, China. Operating in the competitive athletic footwear and apparel sector, the company serves both adult and children's markets through its 361° core and 361° Kids brands. With a network of over 5,270 retail stores across China and a strong e-commerce presence on platforms like Tmall, Taobao, and JD.com, 361 Degrees has established itself as a significant player in China's growing sportswear industry. The company's comprehensive product portfolio includes performance footwear, athletic apparel, and accessories designed for various sports and casual lifestyle use. As consumer health consciousness and sports participation continue to rise in China, 361 Degrees leverages its domestic manufacturing capabilities and extensive distribution network to capture market share in the rapidly expanding Chinese sportswear market, competing with both international giants and local competitors.

Investment Summary

361 Degrees presents a mixed investment case with several notable strengths and challenges. The company demonstrates solid financial fundamentals with HKD 10.07 billion in revenue and HKD 1.15 billion net income, reflecting healthy profitability margins. With a low beta of 0.305, the stock shows defensive characteristics relative to market volatility. The company maintains a strong balance sheet with HKD 4.25 billion in cash against only HKD 264.5 million in debt, providing financial flexibility. However, operating cash flow of HKD 69.8 million appears relatively weak compared to net income, and capital expenditures of HKD -268.7 million suggest significant ongoing investment requirements. The dividend yield appears attractive at HKD 0.41 per share, but investors should monitor the sustainability of this payout given the cash flow dynamics. The primary investment thesis hinges on 361 Degrees' ability to compete effectively in China's crowded sportswear market against both established global brands and aggressive local competitors.

Competitive Analysis

361 Degrees operates in the highly competitive Chinese sportswear market, where it occupies a middle-tier position between premium international brands and value-oriented local competitors. The company's competitive advantage stems from its deep understanding of the Chinese consumer market, extensive domestic distribution network of over 5,270 stores, and dual-brand strategy targeting both adults and children. Its manufacturing capabilities provide cost advantages and supply chain control, while its multi-channel approach combining physical retail with e-commerce platforms (Tmall, Taobao, JD) ensures broad market reach. However, 361 Degrees faces intense competition from global giants like Nike and Adidas that command premium brand recognition and from local leaders like Anta and Li Ning that have successfully upgraded their brand positioning. The company's challenge lies in differentiating its products in a saturated market while maintaining price competitiveness. Its focus on the children's segment through 361° Kids provides a growth avenue but also faces specialized competition. The company's relatively weaker brand equity compared to market leaders limits its pricing power and margin potential, requiring continued investment in marketing and product innovation to enhance brand perception and customer loyalty.

Major Competitors

  • Anta Sports Products Limited (2020.HK): Anta is China's largest sportswear company with a multi-brand strategy including Fila China and international acquisitions. Its strengths include dominant market share, strong brand portfolio, and extensive retail network. However, Anta faces integration challenges with its acquired brands and increasing competition from both international and local players. Compared to 361 Degrees, Anta operates at a significantly larger scale and has stronger brand equity, but may be more exposed to premium market competition.
  • Li Ning Company Limited (2331.HK): Li Ning is a leading Chinese sportswear brand with strong national identity and successful brand rejuvenation. Its strengths include strong brand heritage, innovative product designs, and effective marketing strategies. Weaknesses include higher price points that may limit mass market appeal and inventory management challenges. Li Ning competes directly with 361 Degrees in the mid-to-premium segment but generally commands higher brand recognition and pricing power.
  • Nike, Inc. (NKE): Nike dominates the global sportswear market with unparalleled brand strength, innovation capabilities, and marketing prowess. Its strengths include global brand recognition, strong product innovation, and digital leadership. Weaknesses include higher price points and occasional controversies in the Chinese market. Nike operates in a premium segment compared to 361 Degrees but represents the aspirational benchmark that Chinese brands must compete against.
  • adidas AG (ADS.DE): Adidas is a global sportswear giant with strong presence in China and innovative product technologies. Strengths include global brand recognition, technical innovation, and strong football heritage. Weaknesses include recent challenges in the Chinese market and competition from both global and local players. Adidas competes in similar categories as 361 Degrees but targets more premium segments, though recent strategy shifts have increased competition in mid-market segments.
  • Xtep International Holdings Limited (1368.HK): Xtep is a direct competitor to 361 Degrees with similar market positioning and product offerings. Its strengths include strong running specialty focus, partnership with Saucony, and extensive retail network. Weaknesses include intense competition in the mid-market segment and margin pressure. Xtep competes most directly with 361 Degrees in terms of target market, price points, and distribution channels, making it the most comparable competitor.
  • China Dongxiang (Group) Co., Ltd. (3818.HK): China Dongxiang operates the Kappa brand in China and has a multi-brand sportswear business. Strengths include brand portfolio diversity and fashion-oriented positioning. Weaknesses include inconsistent performance and stronger competition in the fashion sportswear segment. While operating in the same broader market, Dongxiang's focus on fashion-oriented sportswear creates some differentiation from 361 Degrees' performance-oriented positioning.
HomeMenuAccount