investorscraft@gmail.com

Stock Analysis & ValuationSunrise Manufacture Group Co., Ltd. (605138.SS)

Professional Stock Screener
Previous Close
$7.43
Sector Valuation Confidence Level
Moderate
Valuation methodValue, $Upside, %
Artificial intelligence (AI)20.38174
Intrinsic value (DCF)2.70-64
Graham-Dodd Method0.01-100
Graham Formulan/a

Strategic Investment Analysis

Company Overview

Sunrise Manufacture Group Co., Ltd. is a prominent vertically integrated textile and apparel manufacturer headquartered in Shengzhou, China. Operating across China, Vietnam, and Cambodia, the company manages a comprehensive supply chain from cotton planting and spinning to fabric production, dyeing, finishing, and garment manufacturing. Organized into Yarn, Fabric, Garment, and Other segments, Sunrise produces and sells a diverse range of products including knitted and woven garments, fabrics, and yarns. A notable strategic diversification includes entry into photovoltaic energy production, signaling a move towards sustainable operations. Founded in 2007 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, the company leverages its vertical integration to control quality and costs, serving both domestic and international markets. As a key player in the Consumer Cyclical sector, Sunrise Manufacture Group's performance is closely tied to global apparel demand, retail trends, and supply chain dynamics, positioning it as a significant manufacturer in the global textile industry.

Investment Summary

Sunrise Manufacture Group presents a mixed investment profile. Positively, the company maintains a strong operating cash flow of CNY 607 million, significantly covering its capital expenditures and indicating healthy core operations. Its low beta of 0.511 suggests lower volatility compared to the broader market, which may appeal to risk-averse investors. However, significant concerns exist. The net income of CNY 46.6 million on revenue of CNY 3.67 billion translates to a very thin net profit margin of approximately 1.3%, highlighting intense competitive pressures and potential inefficiencies. Furthermore, the high total debt of CNY 2.2 billion relative to cash and equivalents of CNY 406 million raises leverage concerns. The modest dividend yield, while a returning capital, is underwhelming given the financial strain. Investment attractiveness is contingent on the company's ability to improve profitability and manage its debt load effectively in a competitive global apparel manufacturing landscape.

Competitive Analysis

Sunrise Manufacture Group's competitive positioning is defined by its vertical integration, which is a key advantage allowing for control over the entire production process from raw material to finished garment. This integration can lead to cost efficiencies, quality control, and faster turnaround times, which are critical in the fast-paced apparel industry. Its geographic footprint, with operations in China, Vietnam, and Cambodia, allows it to leverage lower labor costs and mitigate risks associated with reliance on a single country, such as trade tariffs or geopolitical tensions. However, the company operates in a highly fragmented and competitive market. Its razor-thin profit margin of 1.3% is a clear indicator of severe price competition and its lack of significant pricing power. Unlike companies that compete on brand value, Sunrise is a pure-play manufacturer, making it a price-taker. The move into photovoltaic energy is a strategic diversification but is unlikely to materially impact its core competitive standing in textiles in the near term. Its primary competitive challenge is to differentiate its manufacturing services—through superior quality, reliability, or sustainability credentials—to command better margins. Without a strong brand or proprietary technology, its competitive advantage remains largely operational and cost-based, which is easily replicable by larger, more financially robust competitors with similar global footprints.

Major Competitors

  • HuaJin Group Co., Ltd. (600448.SS): HuaJin Group is a major Chinese textile manufacturer with a similar vertically integrated model, producing yarn, fabric, and garments. Its strengths lie in its scale and established domestic presence. Compared to Sunrise, HuaJin may have greater financial resources and deeper customer relationships. A key weakness, shared with Sunrise, is exposure to the cyclical nature of the textile industry and intense domestic competition, which pressures margins.
  • Jiangsu King's Luck Brewery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. (601339.SS): Note: This appears to be an incorrect match. A more relevant competitor would be a major apparel manufacturer like Shenzhou International Group Holdings Ltd. (2313.HK). Shenzhou International is a Hong Kong-listed, China-based powerhouse supplying global brands like Nike and Adidas. Its strengths are immense scale, advanced manufacturing technology, and long-term contracts with top-tier clients, giving it a significant advantage over smaller players like Sunrise. Its weakness could be higher exposure to Western consumer demand fluctuations.
  • Shandong Ruyi Technology Group Co., Ltd. (002083.SZ): Shandong Ruyi is a large-scale textile and apparel group known for its aggressive acquisition strategy to build a global fashion empire. Its strength is its diversified brand portfolio and international reach. However, this has led to high debt levels and integration challenges. Compared to Sunrise's manufacturing focus, Ruyy's brand-oriented strategy is different, but it represents a larger, more diversified competitor in the broader textile ecosystem.
  • PVH Corp. (PVH): PVH is a global apparel company owning iconic brands like Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger. Its strength is powerful brand equity and direct control over marketing and distribution, allowing for higher margins. Unlike Sunrise, which is a manufacturer, PVH is a brand owner that outsources production to companies like Sunrise. This makes PVH a customer and an indirect competitor for margin. PVH's weakness includes reliance on brand perception and the costs of global marketing.
  • Tapestry, Inc. (TPR): Tapestry owns luxury brands like Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman. Its competitive position is based on premium branding, direct-to-consumer retail, and high margins. Similar to PVH, Tapestry is a client for manufacturers like Sunrise, not a direct manufacturing competitor. Its model is fundamentally different, competing on brand desirability rather than production efficiency. Its main weakness is sensitivity to luxury consumer spending cycles.
HomeMenuAccount