investorscraft@gmail.com

Stock Analysis & ValuationCoterra Energy Inc. (CTRA)

📄 CTRA Stock Analysis Report (PDF) – Comprehensive breakdown including fundamentals, valuations, peer comparisons, and outlook (October 2025)
Previous Close
$23.55
Sector Valuation Confidence Level
Low
Valuation methodValue, $Upside, %
Artificial intelligence (AI)22.07-6
Intrinsic value (DCF)10.17-57
Graham-Dodd Method12.60-46
Graham Formula6.50-72
Find stocks with the best potential

Strategic Investment Analysis

Company Overview

Coterra Energy Inc. (NYSE: CTRA) is a leading independent oil and gas exploration and production company with a diversified portfolio across key U.S. shale plays. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Coterra operates in the Marcellus Shale (dry gas), Permian Basin (oil-weighted), and Anadarko Basin (liquids-rich gas), with a combined ~665,000 net acres. The company boasts proved reserves of ~2.9 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE), with a balanced mix of natural gas (52%), natural gas liquids (16%), and crude oil (32%). Coterra’s integrated midstream assets in Texas enhance operational efficiency. Serving industrial customers, utilities, and energy marketers, Coterra benefits from its low-cost structure and disciplined capital allocation. With a $18.7B market cap, the company combines growth potential with shareholder returns, offering a ~5% dividend yield. Its ESG-focused approach and multi-basin diversification position it as a resilient player in the evolving energy sector.

Investment Summary

Coterra Energy presents a compelling investment case due to its balanced commodity mix (reducing exposure to price volatility), strong free cash flow generation ($2.8B operating cash flow in FY2023), and commitment to shareholder returns (dividend yield ~5%). Its low breakeven costs ($35–40 WTI for free cash flow) and hedge portfolio provide downside protection. However, risks include natural gas price sensitivity (52% of reserves) and regulatory pressures on shale development. The company’s leverage is manageable (net debt/EBITDA ~1.0x), and its Permian assets offer oil-linked growth optionality. Investors should weigh its defensive yield against commodity cycle exposure.

Competitive Analysis

Coterra’s competitive advantage stems from three pillars: (1) **Diversified Asset Base**: Unlike pure-play Permian or Marcellus operators, Coterra’s multi-basin portfolio mitigates regional risks and optimizes capital allocation. Its Marcellus position is among the lowest-cost dry gas plays (breakeven <$2.00/MMBtu), while the Permian acreage competes with tier-1 operators. (2) **Integrated Midstream**: Ownership of gathering systems in the Permian reduces transportation costs and ensures flow assurance, a edge vs. pure upstream peers. (3) **Financial Discipline**: Coterra’s 50% free cash flow return target (dividends + buybacks) outperforms many E&P peers prioritizing growth. Competitively, it lags Permian pure-plays (e.g., Pioneer) in oil production growth but excels in gas cost efficiency vs. Appalachia peers (e.g., EQT). Its scale (~740K BOE/day) allows hedging sophistication, while smaller rivals face liquidity constraints. ESG initiatives (methane intensity <0.1%) align with investor preferences vs. higher-emission competitors.

Major Competitors

  • Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD): Pioneer dominates the Permian Basin with ~1M net acres and superior oil-weighted production (85% liquids). Strengths include scale-driven efficiencies and ExxonMobil’s pending acquisition premium. Weaknesses: limited gas exposure and higher capex intensity vs. Coterra’s balanced model.
  • EQT Corporation (EQT): The largest U.S. natural gas producer, focused on Appalachia. Strengths: lowest-cost gas reserves and LNG export leverage. Weaknesses: pure-gas model exposes it to price swings, lacking Coterra’s oil hedge. Also carries higher debt (net debt/EBITDA ~1.5x).
  • Diamondback Energy (FANG): Permian-focused with peer-leading margins (~$15/BOE cash ops cost). Strengths: high-growth oil output and synergies from Endeavor merger. Weaknesses: minimal gas diversification and higher geopolitical risk in the Delaware Basin vs. Coterra’s Anadarko position.
  • Marathon Oil (MRO): Balanced Bakken/Eagle Ford/Permian operator with a similar multi-basin approach. Strengths: aggressive buybacks (10%+ yield). Weaknesses: higher decline rates and less efficient gas ops than Coterra’s Marcellus core.
HomeMenuAccount