| Valuation method | Value, $ | Upside, % |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence (AI) | n/a | n/a |
| Intrinsic value (DCF) | n/a | |
| Graham-Dodd Method | n/a | |
| Graham Formula | n/a |
Tharimmune, Inc. (NASDAQ: THAR) is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing innovative therapeutics for rare, inflammatory, and oncologic diseases. Headquartered in Bridgewater, New Jersey, the company leverages its immuno-oncology pipeline to target conditions such as liver-related pruritus and solid tumors. Key candidates include TH104 for pruritogenic inflammatory conditions, TH3215 and TH0059 for solid tumors, and TH1940, a PD-1-targeting therapy. Tharimmune collaborates with Minotaur Therapeutics to advance proprietary biologics, reflecting its commitment to cutting-edge research. Formerly known as Hillstream BioPharma, the company rebranded in 2023 to align with its evolving focus on immune-modulating therapies. With a market cap of ~$3.6M and a preclinical-stage pipeline, Tharimmune operates in the high-risk, high-reward biotech sector, where success hinges on clinical milestones and partnerships.
Tharimmune presents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity for investors comfortable with preclinical biotech volatility. The company’s lack of revenue and negative EPS (-$9.41) reflect its early-stage status, while its $3.6M market cap suggests speculative valuation. Strengths include a niche focus on immuno-oncology and pruritus, areas with unmet medical needs, and a collaboration with Minotaur Therapeutics. However, significant risks include cash burn ($10.9M operating cash outflow in FY2023) and reliance on future funding to advance pipelines. The absence of debt is a positive, but the near-term catalyst will be clinical progress for TH104 or other candidates. Investors should monitor trial updates and partnership expansions closely.
Tharimmune competes in the crowded immuno-oncology and inflammatory disease space, where differentiation is critical. Its focus on pruritus (TH104) offers a niche advantage, as few companies target liver-related itch specifically. However, the PD-1 inhibitor space (TH1940) is dominated by giants like Merck (Keytruda) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (Opdivo), making commercialization challenging without superior efficacy or safety data. The company’s preclinical stage limits direct comparisons, but its asset diversity (oncology + inflammation) could attract partnership interest. Tharimmune’s collaboration with Minotaur Therapeutics provides access to targeted biologics, but scalability remains unproven. Competitors with deeper pipelines and commercialization experience, such as Incyte (pruritus) and smaller firms like Cara Therapeutics, pose significant threats. Tharimmune’s success hinges on achieving clinical validation and securing additional funding or partnerships to offset its limited resources.