| Valuation method | Value, $ | Upside, % |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence (AI) | 13138.10 | 53525 |
| Intrinsic value (DCF) | 1221.10 | 4884 |
| Graham-Dodd Method | 43497.14 | 177439 |
| Graham Formula | 22126.63 | 90213 |
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally owned corporation established in 1933, headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee. As one of the largest public power providers in the U.S., TVA generates electricity from a diverse mix of coal, nuclear, hydroelectric, natural gas, and renewable energy sources. Serving nearly 10 million people across seven southeastern states, TVA operates as a self-financed entity, reinvesting revenues into infrastructure, sustainability initiatives, and community development. Unlike investor-owned utilities, TVA prioritizes affordability, reliability, and environmental stewardship, aligning with its mission to promote economic growth in the Tennessee Valley region. With a strong focus on decarbonization, TVA is expanding its renewable energy portfolio while maintaining grid stability. Its unique federal charter and not-for-profit structure distinguish it from traditional energy providers, making it a key player in the transition to cleaner energy.
TVA offers a stable investment profile due to its federally backed status, diversified energy generation, and essential service role in the Southeast U.S. Its low beta (0.136) suggests minimal volatility relative to the market, appealing to risk-averse investors. However, its lack of publicly traded equity (only debt securities like PARRS A 2029 are available) limits direct equity participation. Revenue ($12.3B) and net income ($1.14B) reflect operational solidity, but its $93.4B debt load and $0 operating cash flow (as reported) warrant scrutiny. The 0.554/share dividend is modest, and its non-profit structure caps shareholder returns. Regulatory risks and decarbonization costs could pressure margins, though its monopoly-like regional position provides resilience.
TVA’s competitive advantage stems from its federal ownership, which grants it access to low-cost financing and tax-exempt status, unlike investor-owned utilities (IOUs). Its integrated generation-transmission model ensures control over reliability and pricing, while its diverse energy mix (including 40% carbon-free generation) hedges against fuel volatility. TVA’s not-for-profit structure allows reinvestment in infrastructure rather than shareholder returns, enabling competitive rates. However, it faces competition from neighboring utilities (e.g., Southern Company) in wholesale markets and must navigate political pressures to accelerate renewables adoption. Unlike IOUs, TVA cannot pass all costs to ratepayers without federal oversight, constraining pricing flexibility. Its regional monopoly limits customer choice but insulates it from retail competition. TVA’s scale and federal backing provide stability, but its debt-heavy balance sheet and aging coal fleet pose long-term risks.